1 2011-04-01T00:02:51 <dreimark> no problem. we also look sometimes on features of other projects and decide if we also want it or not.
2 2011-04-01T00:02:59 *** grzywacz
3 2011-04-01T00:03:14 <dreimark> and we sometimes implement something too and have to learn later that we better haven't
4 2011-04-01T00:03:43 <sinha> okay..so its depreceated in moin2.0
5 2011-04-01T00:03:49 <dreimark> that was for e.g. how to handle blanks in names
6 2011-04-01T00:04:35 <dreimark> that idea was from wikipedia
7 2011-04-01T00:05:01 <dreimark> at 1.6 we learned that we better let a blabk one and don't use a _ for it
8 2011-04-01T00:05:30 <sinha> yes i also felt some trouble in implementing that tree indexing..but solved it now
9 2011-04-01T00:06:03 <sinha> reg that tree indexing..i want to know one more thing..what if someone deletes a parent item..then where will it childrens go
10 2011-04-01T00:06:29 <sinha> isnt there any option of making them child of deleted parent item's parent
11 2011-04-01T00:06:34 <ThomasWaldmann> they live independant lifes
12 2011-04-01T00:06:53 <sinha> but we wont be able to see them in site index, right >
13 2011-04-01T00:06:54 <sinha> ?
14 2011-04-01T00:07:26 <ThomasWaldmann> hmm, right, that is a problem of the current implementation
15 2011-04-01T00:07:52 <sinha> what if we make them child of previous parent..something done regarding unix processes
16 2011-04-01T00:08:05 <sinha> is it logically correct ?
17 2011-04-01T00:08:14 *** Marchael
18 2011-04-01T00:09:28 <ThomasWaldmann> no, that doesn't work
19 2011-04-01T00:09:37 <dreimark> we should have a placeholder for the deleted item
20 2011-04-01T00:09:46 <ThomasWaldmann> but flat_index should maybe work a bit differently
21 2011-04-01T00:10:52 <dreimark> or a nonexisting item
22 2011-04-01T00:11:04 <dreimark> because you can also create the subitem first
23 2011-04-01T00:11:15 <ThomasWaldmann> i think we should list nonexisting items if there are still childs
24 2011-04-01T00:12:51 <dreimark> yes, there are more cases, destroyed, renamed etc
25 2011-04-01T00:13:00 <sinha> so what i am supposed to do in case of hierarchy indexing..what to do with subitems whose parents do not exist ?
26 2011-04-01T00:13:26 <sinha> as in my current implementation..those subitems will remain hidden
27 2011-04-01T00:13:45 <sinha> and wont be shown..unless trigerred by their parent item
28 2011-04-01T00:15:02 <dreimark> i think they should be directly shown
29 2011-04-01T00:15:06 <ThomasWaldmann> well, if flat_index behaves as i said, that would be fixed, right?
30 2011-04-01T00:15:25 <dreimark> sure
31 2011-04-01T00:18:14 *** sinha
32 2011-04-01T01:29:04 *** MattMaker
33 2011-04-01T01:32:24 *** m4k3r
34 2011-04-01T01:40:48 *** m4k3r
35 2011-04-01T01:44:46 *** m4k3r
36 2011-04-01T02:19:18 *** sinha
37 2011-04-01T02:19:20 *** sinha
38 2011-04-01T04:38:59 *** MattMaker
39 2011-04-01T04:43:37 *** Marchael
40 2011-04-01T04:45:46 <Marchael> moin
41 2011-04-01T04:54:00 <Marchael> ThomasWaldmann: I recieved message from and that he is wrote about adding and removing fields in schema: "Adding and removing fields doesn't really have any performance penalty... it's the same as if you made your own "sub-fields" by indexing keywords like "tag/foo" and "link/bar". The only difference adding a field makes is the extra disk space to store the pickled field type object, which is small."
42 2011-04-01T04:59:18 *** Marchael1
43 2011-04-01T04:59:46 <Marchael1> s/from/from Matt/
44 2011-04-01T05:01:54 *** Marchael
45 2011-04-01T05:08:36 *** ronny
46 2011-04-01T05:21:50 *** kursor
47 2011-04-01T05:26:26 *** ronny
48 2011-04-01T05:28:53 *** MattMaker
49 2011-04-01T05:46:36 *** Marchael1
50 2011-04-01T06:02:44 *** kasun
51 2011-04-01T06:07:51 <sl33k_> dreimark: how do i return both, the item and the no of revisions done to that item, to the template?
52 2011-04-01T06:08:41 <sl33k_> should the output be like for e.g "moin: 2" for two revisions contributed?
53 2011-04-01T06:15:53 *** Marchael
54 2011-04-01T06:27:57 *** kursor
55 2011-04-01T06:44:00 *** Marchael
56 2011-04-01T06:47:56 *** MattMaker
57 2011-04-01T06:52:34 *** Marchael
58 2011-04-01T07:26:29 *** andialbrecht_
59 2011-04-01T09:04:18 <dreimark> sl33k_: you send an other parameter to the template
60 2011-04-01T09:04:31 <dreimark> that sounds good
61 2011-04-01T09:04:59 <dreimark> moin should be then link to the page
62 2011-04-01T09:05:06 <dreimark> btw. moin
63 2011-04-01T09:16:32 <sl33k_> moin
64 2011-04-01T09:29:36 *** Marchael
65 2011-04-01T09:32:20 *** andialbrecht
66 2011-04-01T09:59:24 *** Marchael
67 2011-04-01T10:14:55 *** Marchael
68 2011-04-01T10:36:26 *** kasun
69 2011-04-01T10:48:45 *** cosmos_thought
70 2011-04-01T10:50:54 <cosmos_thought> moin
71 2011-04-01T11:05:06 *** MattMaker
72 2011-04-01T11:30:13 *** kasun
73 2011-04-01T11:31:32 *** greg_f
74 2011-04-01T12:19:24 *** humbu
75 2011-04-01T12:19:29 *** humbu
76 2011-04-01T12:39:24 *** franklin_
77 2011-04-01T12:40:16 *** franklin
78 2011-04-01T13:01:55 *** humbu
79 2011-04-01T13:02:12 <humbu> hello, how can i get the actual sitename in a macro?
80 2011-04-01T13:09:28 <humbu> ok, it is macro.request.url - where can i find this on docs.moinmo.in?
81 2011-04-01T13:12:14 <TheSheep> humbu: http://docs.moinmo.in/moin/1.9/MoinMoin.support.werkzeug.wrappers.Request-class.html
82 2011-04-01T13:13:23 <humbu> aaah, thanks - not easy to find
83 2011-04-01T13:13:23 *** humbu
84 2011-04-01T13:41:54 <ThomasWaldmann> moin
85 2011-04-01T13:46:34 *** andialbrecht_
86 2011-04-01T14:26:43 *** m4k3r
87 2011-04-01T14:29:11 *** MattMaker
88 2011-04-01T14:32:53 *** MattMaker
89 2011-04-01T14:41:20 *** kasun
90 2011-04-01T14:43:37 *** m4k3r
91 2011-04-01T14:43:38 *** maker_
92 2011-04-01T14:53:54 *** sinha
93 2011-04-01T14:54:32 *** kasun
94 2011-04-01T15:20:07 *** greg
95 2011-04-01T15:25:24 *** greg_f
96 2011-04-01T15:58:24 *** MattMaker
97 2011-04-01T16:03:32 *** kursor
98 2011-04-01T16:18:50 *** maker_
99 2011-04-01T16:21:36 *** andialbrecht
100 2011-04-01T16:41:37 *** kasun
101 2011-04-01T16:46:08 *** sl33k
102 2011-04-01T16:49:13 *** sl33k_
103 2011-04-01T17:20:06 *** sl33k
104 2011-04-01T17:20:25 *** sl33k_
105 2011-04-01T17:44:50 *** kasun
106 2011-04-01T17:55:21 *** m4k3r
107 2011-04-01T18:10:10 *** cosmos_thought
108 2011-04-01T18:12:25 *** kasun
109 2011-04-01T18:25:51 *** kasun
110 2011-04-01T18:27:18 <sinha> ThomasWaldmann: dreimark : tree index view updated http://web.iiit.ac.in/~akash.sinhaug08/moin/Web%20Tutorial.html ... please suggest some test cases..like what kind of name i shd use
111 2011-04-01T18:31:05 <ThomasWaldmann> one of the requirements for a soc project might be that the student can make up sensible test cases on his own :D
112 2011-04-01T18:38:53 <sinha> ThomasWaldmann: yes i can do that but i havent come to know that what kind of chars one could use in a item name..its isnt in any docs i guess
113 2011-04-01T18:42:26 <ThomasWaldmann> any unicode char
114 2011-04-01T18:42:35 <ThomasWaldmann> of course / has a special meaning
115 2011-04-01T18:42:41 <ThomasWaldmann> must go, bbl
116 2011-04-01T18:44:32 *** sinha
117 2011-04-01T19:05:13 *** m4k3r
118 2011-04-01T19:22:22 *** kursor
119 2011-04-01T19:27:58 *** m4k3r
120 2011-04-01T19:30:48 *** cdom
121 2011-04-01T19:37:33 *** greg
122 2011-04-01T20:03:01 *** cdom_
123 2011-04-01T20:03:02 *** cdom
124 2011-04-01T20:28:50 *** andialbrecht_
125 2011-04-01T20:41:05 *** MattMaker
126 2011-04-01T21:35:24 <ThomasWaldmann> re
127 2011-04-01T21:48:05 *** cdom_
128 2011-04-01T22:12:35 <CIA-58> Thomas Waldmann <tw AT waldmann-edv DOT de> default * 5776:70dfb3dea12d 1.9/MoinMoin/auth/log.py: fix auth.log docstring
129 2011-04-01T22:26:49 *** grzywacz
130 2011-04-01T22:30:27 *** andialbrecht
131 2011-04-01T22:43:15 *** kasun
132 2011-04-01T23:33:12 *** sinha
133 2011-04-01T23:39:22 *** sinha
134
MoinMoin: MoinMoinChat/Logs/moin-dev/2011-04-01 (last edited 2011-03-31 22:45:02 by IrcLogImporter)