1 2009-02-16T00:05:33 <dreimark> ok, the debug script based on the failing test runs without a failure http://moinmo.in/ReimarBauer/pastebin#debug_script_for_BadCon_failing_test
2 2009-02-16T00:06:02 <dreimark> unfortunally this means the testsetup is broken
3 2009-02-16T00:07:19 <CIA-38> Thomas Waldmann <tw AT waldmann-edv DOT de> default * 4594:d706f5d4f4ec 1.9/MoinMoin/ (5 files in 5 dirs): fix ScriptContext URL default value
4 2009-02-16T00:10:06 *** grzywacz
5 2009-02-16T00:20:25 * ThomasWaldmann uploads beta1
6 2009-02-16T00:32:17 <ThomasWaldmann> hmm, where has our topic gone?
7 2009-02-16T00:36:35 *** ThomasWaldmann
8 2009-02-16T00:43:57 *** starGaming
9 2009-02-16T00:51:21 * dreimark has tests finished: 1057 passed, 13 failed, 68 skipped in 85.62 seconds
10 2009-02-16T00:51:42 * ThomasWaldmann has only 1 X)
11 2009-02-16T00:51:48 <dreimark> MoinMoin/request/_tests/test_request.py[11] FFFFFFFFFFF
12 2009-02-16T00:52:41 <dreimark> mostly AttributeError: 'AllContext' object has no attribute 'emit_http_headers'
13 2009-02-16T00:52:53 * dreimark creates a fresh clone
14 2009-02-16T00:55:07 <dreimark> cool a fresh clone tells tests finished: 1172 passed, 68 skipped in 78.97 seconds
15 2009-02-16T00:55:11 <dreimark> so 0 error
16 2009-02-16T00:55:35 <ThomasWaldmann> assert random()
17 2009-02-16T01:00:53 <dreimark> mercurial has a problem. I have reverted several times and now I have old code
18 2009-02-16T01:01:27 <ThomasWaldmann> ?
19 2009-02-16T01:04:07 <dreimark> well 1.9 does not have MoinMoin/request/* but my local clone has
20 2009-02-16T01:04:37 <dreimark> I think that happens because of some reverts I tried and now it is not able to remove those dir/files again
21 2009-02-16T01:04:42 <ronny> hmm
22 2009-02-16T01:05:38 <dreimark> a clone form this "corrupted" one works well
23 2009-02-16T01:06:42 <dreimark> hg status tells e.g. ? MoinMoin/request/request_cgi.py
24 2009-02-16T01:08:48 <ThomasWaldmann> that means it is just there, but not under revision control (any more)
25 2009-02-16T01:09:38 <ThomasWaldmann> if you don't have anything valuable there, just do a clone and throw away the other one
26 2009-02-16T01:09:45 <dreimark> yeah also it means _tests are there which can't work with current code
27 2009-02-16T01:09:58 <dreimark> did already
28 2009-02-16T01:10:45 <dreimark> ronny: hg revert --all seems to have sometimes a problem to remove "removed" files
29 2009-02-16T01:11:06 * dreimark is not sure about sometime or anytime
30 2009-02-16T01:13:24 <ThomasWaldmann> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk7LcugO3zg
31 2009-02-16T01:13:49 <dreimark> no failing test
32 2009-02-16T01:13:58 <dreimark> may be ThomasWaldmann try a clone too
33 2009-02-16T01:14:47 <ThomasWaldmann> yeah, 0
34 2009-02-16T01:16:37 <dreimark> that coffee does not look like coffee it is not black enough. It could be tea
35 2009-02-16T01:17:13 * dreimark kills the pastebin
36 2009-02-16T01:38:40 <dreimark> good night
37 2009-02-16T01:39:45 <ThomasWaldmann> gn dreimark
38 2009-02-16T05:25:45 *** nwp
39 2009-02-16T06:39:20 *** starGaming
40 2009-02-16T07:11:26 *** starGaming
41 2009-02-16T08:35:20 *** grzywacz
42 2009-02-16T10:49:36 *** xorAxAx
43 2009-02-16T10:50:12 <ronny> ThomasWaldmann: i just figured something __very__ cool - bzr can merge parts of a branch
44 2009-02-16T10:51:03 <ronny> that solves basically all of my issues with merge granularity for dvcs-backed wikis
45 2009-02-16T10:59:07 <dreimark> moin
46 2009-02-16T11:06:35 <ThomasWaldmann> ronny: i never had issues with that
47 2009-02-16T11:07:32 <ThomasWaldmann> (maybe pawel / TheSheep had?)
48 2009-02-16T11:07:36 <ronny> ThomasWaldmann: well, if n pages diverged on different repos and one wants to solve only one thats tricky
49 2009-02-16T11:07:39 <TheSheep> ronny: you mean merging single files?
50 2009-02-16T11:07:51 <ronny> TheSheep: yup
51 2009-02-16T11:08:02 <TheSheep> no problems with that in hg
52 2009-02-16T11:08:17 <ronny> TheSheep: not if N files diverged
53 2009-02-16T11:08:40 <dreimark> ronny: is that mercurial revert problem known I had yesterday?
54 2009-02-16T11:08:41 <TheSheep> ronny: I can merge and commit a single file
55 2009-02-16T11:09:16 <TheSheep> ronny: I just pass a filter function to the merge function
56 2009-02-16T11:09:43 <ronny> TheSheep: and what will it do to unmerged stuff?
57 2009-02-16T11:10:08 <TheSheep> nothing
58 2009-02-16T11:10:25 <ronny> will it still be able to merge it later?
59 2009-02-16T11:11:52 <ronny> hmm, i gotta take a closer look a how hg will track that
60 2009-02-16T11:12:28 <ronny> TheSheep: any idea why this isnt exposed in the ui?
61 2009-02-16T11:13:17 <TheSheep> no
62 2009-02-16T11:13:36 <TheSheep> I needed it for my wiki, I might be doing something wrong though :)
63 2009-02-16T11:14:25 <ronny> bbl, gotta carch the train
64 2009-02-16T11:34:30 <ThomasWaldmann> http://whoosh.ca/
65 2009-02-16T11:35:15 <ThomasWaldmann> http://xapian.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/xapian-performance-comparision-with-whoosh/
66 2009-02-16T11:37:50 <TheSheep> nice
67 2009-02-16T12:56:13 <ThomasWaldmann> hopefully that one has a longer lifetime than lupy
68 2009-02-16T12:59:43 <ronny> TheSheep: seems like partial merges might produce fail in subsequent merges
69 2009-02-16T13:05:05 <TheSheep> ronny: I see
70 2009-02-16T13:06:45 <ronny> however they do on all systems
71 2009-02-16T13:31:32 <dreimark> ronny: is that the problem I have had yesterday?
72 2009-02-16T13:32:52 <ronny> dreimark: im not sure, i dont understand your problem
73 2009-02-16T13:53:34 <dreimark> ronny: I did for moin-1.9 e.g. hg revert -r 3412 --all and then hg revert --all
74 2009-02-16T13:53:49 <dreimark> hg status shows now lots of removed files
75 2009-02-16T14:12:02 <ronny> dreimark: hg debugrebuilddirstate
76 2009-02-16T14:19:27 <dreimark> hmm that option is unknown and hg debugrebuild -r tip does not change the status
77 2009-02-16T14:27:18 <ronny> hmm
78 2009-02-16T14:27:28 <ronny> then its probably called different
79 2009-02-16T14:39:31 <ThomasWaldmann> dreimark: what is your goal?
80 2009-02-16T14:56:21 <dreimark> ThomasWaldmann: to get the previously deleted files removed.
81 2009-02-16T14:56:50 <dreimark> it is bad that I can go to an old revision but not back to the current state
82 2009-02-16T14:59:04 <ronny> dreimark: did you talk with the people in #mercurial ?
83 2009-02-16T14:59:26 <dreimark> ronny: not now will do later
84 2009-02-16T15:28:55 <ThomasWaldmann> dreimark: so you want which revision in the workdir?
85 2009-02-16T15:29:03 <dreimark> the tip
86 2009-02-16T15:29:12 <ThomasWaldmann> how about hg up?
87 2009-02-16T15:29:53 <dreimark> no change for hg status
88 2009-02-16T15:30:13 <ThomasWaldmann> it won't touch files that are not under revision control
89 2009-02-16T15:31:11 <dreimark> hmm, but there must be command which redos all the hg remove changes otherwise revert is broken
90 2009-02-16T15:32:20 <dreimark> currently you can go to a revision where those file were under revision control
91 2009-02-16T15:32:32 <ThomasWaldmann> revert only deals with revision controlled files
92 2009-02-16T15:34:19 <ThomasWaldmann> --no-backup do not save backup copies of files
93 2009-02-16T15:34:28 <ThomasWaldmann> maybe that revert option is interesting
94 2009-02-16T15:35:13 <dreimark> well if you do hg remove or hg mv in an early cs you can get theses files back but if you go forward the old names stay
95 2009-02-16T15:37:00 <dreimark> it may not named a bug but it sounds terrible inconsitant
96 2009-02-16T15:38:37 <ThomasWaldmann> hg does not care what you do in your work directory with files that are not under revision control
97 2009-02-16T15:39:02 <ThomasWaldmann> so if you want to clean up, remove everything with status "?"
98 2009-02-16T15:39:23 <dreimark> that's why you should not move or rm files, but you use hg's command to keep annotation etc.
99 2009-02-16T15:39:47 <dreimark> so hg knows what it has to do but it doesn't repeat it
100 2009-02-16T15:39:48 <ThomasWaldmann> i still don't see the problem, the repo is fine, isn't it?
101 2009-02-16T15:40:26 <dreimark> I have files which I don't want to have. b
102 2009-02-16T15:40:36 <ThomasWaldmann> but not in the repo
103 2009-02-16T15:40:54 <dreimark> not under version control but on the working dir
104 2009-02-16T15:41:47 <ThomasWaldmann> you can even just delete everything in the workdir (except .hg) and just do a hg up afterwards
105 2009-02-16T15:42:26 <dreimark> and I guess (will try later) if I redo every cs from the starting point hg will remove again the removed files
106 2009-02-16T17:58:51 *** LotekThirteen
107 2009-02-16T18:18:50 *** starGaming
108 2009-02-16T18:45:05 *** starshine_away
109 2009-02-16T19:27:13 *** LotekThirteen
110 2009-02-16T20:32:17 <dreimark> ThomasWaldmann: TheSheep what have I done wrong http://paste.pocoo.org/show/104187/
111 2009-02-16T20:32:33 <dreimark> it seems never to call _latex_formula_repl
112 2009-02-16T20:36:28 <ThomasWaldmann> dreimark: check parens
113 2009-02-16T20:38:08 <TheSheep> dreimark: scan_re gets compiled in the class itself, before init()
114 2009-02-16T20:39:31 <TheSheep> dreimark: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/104188/
115 2009-02-16T20:39:54 <TheSheep> meh, bad indent
116 2009-02-16T20:40:48 <ronny> dreimark: indent
117 2009-02-16T20:41:08 <ronny> dreimark: scan_rules vs extensions/scan_re
118 2009-02-16T20:41:38 <TheSheep> ronny: yeah, that's what I get for editing in web form
119 2009-02-16T20:41:50 <ronny> ah, i see
120 2009-02-16T20:49:05 <dreimark> closer, now I have to find the parens problem
121 2009-02-16T20:49:35 <dreimark> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/104191/
122 2009-02-16T20:50:38 <TheSheep> dreimark: you are using r'' but still doubling the backslash...
123 2009-02-16T21:49:04 <dreimark> hmm, cia vc broken again
124 2009-02-16T21:49:22 <dreimark> changeset: 358:73775c708eba
125 2009-02-16T21:49:22 <dreimark> tag: tip
126 2009-02-16T21:49:22 <dreimark> user: Reimar Bauer <rb.proj AT googlemail DOT com>
127 2009-02-16T21:49:22 <dreimark> date: Mon Feb 16 21:47:58 2009 +0100
128 2009-02-16T21:49:22 <dreimark> summary: refactored inline_latex parser from JohannesBerg. This parser allows regular moin moin wiki syntax, but also latex style inline formulas lik
129 2009-02-16T21:49:26 <dreimark> e $...$ and latex style paragraph formulas like $$...$$.
130 2009-02-16T21:49:52 <dreimark> \o/
131 2009-02-16T22:40:38 <dreimark> TheSheep: ronny thanks now it rocks
132 2009-02-16T22:50:35 <ronny> hu?
133 2009-02-16T23:08:09 <dreimark> inline_latex
134 2009-02-16T23:09:26 *** grzywacz
135
