2007-03-25T17:10:24 <dreimark> I do like to see the storage engine refactored but only if he get finished that. Is his MoinMoin experience known?
2007-03-25T17:11:30 <dreimark> sorry I have to go to the train station, will be back somewhere in the evening
2007-03-25T17:47:45 * ThomasWaldmann looks at Heinrich's code
2007-03-25T18:56:46 <ThomasWaldmann> moin lanius
2007-03-25T19:20:49 <ThomasWaldmann> lanius: query?
2007-03-25T19:44:14 <lanius> ThomasWaldmann: yeah, sorry
2007-03-25T22:39:39 <rhoe> good evening altogether!
2007-03-25T22:40:23 <rhoe> changeset 1892 - dc1c3ca94cf8 : css_class does not validate for html 4.01 strict
2007-03-25T23:15:43 <ThomasWaldmann> moin rhoe
2007-03-25T23:17:00 <ThomasWaldmann> rhoe: which branch?
2007-03-25T23:24:31 <rhoe> ah! moin thomas!
2007-03-25T23:24:40 <rhoe> it's the 1.6 branch..
2007-03-25T23:24:55 <rhoe> came up with this since i tested simplemente if it is valid..
2007-03-25T23:25:18 <rhoe> did some mistake for the page_footer1... div missing...
2007-03-25T23:25:33 <rhoe> css_class caused also trouble..
2007-03-25T23:31:32 <rhoe> just also wanted to do some extended MonthCalender macro which shows the page e.g. 25_3_07 in an <iframe>...
2007-03-25T23:31:40 <rhoe> this works fine..
2007-03-25T23:31:51 <rhoe> you can also edit the page in this frame..
2007-03-25T23:32:03 <rhoe> however iframes are not allowed in strict...
2007-03-25T23:32:09 <rhoe> shit!
2007-03-25T23:33:28 <rhoe> wanted to use that for taskplanner so if you click in the calender on a date the page is displayed in the <iframe> under the monthcalender..
2007-03-25T23:33:48 <rhoe> there is no need to go back an forth on the pages anymore..
2007-03-25T23:34:12 <ThomasWaldmann> one after the other. where is that changeset? url?
2007-03-25T23:35:20 <rhoe> ok..ok..
2007-03-25T23:35:29 <ThomasWaldmann> ok, found it
2007-03-25T23:35:43 <ThomasWaldmann> i thought what you give is the commit comment
2007-03-25T23:36:12 <rhoe> http://hg.thinkmo.de/moin/1.6?cl=1901
2007-03-25T23:36:43 <rhoe> don't use ID for navi_bar links as there are 2 navibars on a page for modern theme
2007-03-25T23:36:59 <ThomasWaldmann> so what is the problem with css_class?
2007-03-25T23:39:17 <rhoe> the w3c validator complains about an unknown attrib..
2007-03-25T23:39:31 <ThomasWaldmann> url?
2007-03-25T23:39:59 <rhoe> http://validator.w3.org/
2007-03-25T23:40:08 <rhoe> i have uploaded a saved file there
2007-03-25T23:40:20 <rhoe> and then checked it..
2007-03-25T23:40:20 <ThomasWaldmann> reproduce it on the test wiki and give me the complete url
2007-03-25T23:41:18 <ThomasWaldmann> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Ftest.wikiwikiweb.de%2F
2007-03-25T23:43:03 <rhoe> sorry thomas...
2007-03-25T23:43:10 <rhoe> if think i did a mistake..
2007-03-25T23:43:18 <rhoe> it does validate..
2007-03-25T23:43:43 <rhoe> sorry..
2007-03-25T23:44:13 <rhoe> css_class is the calling para of the python function..
2007-03-25T23:44:27 <rhoe> i have put that manually in the html file...
2007-03-25T23:44:36 <rhoe> slap my forehead..
2007-03-25T23:44:43 <rhoe> that's of course a no brainer...
2007-03-25T23:45:54 <ThomasWaldmann> :) we use css_class because class is is a python keyword
2007-03-25T23:46:01 <rhoe> right...
2007-03-25T23:46:05 <rhoe> shame on me..
2007-03-25T23:46:33 <rhoe> looked at the diff and did not think about that..
2007-03-25T23:47:12 <ThomasWaldmann> the lower layer has some magic to map css_class -> "class"
2007-03-25T23:47:31 <rhoe> ok.. however there is no way now to easly link with page internal links to that menu item..
2007-03-25T23:47:41 <rhoe> you could do that with ids, or?
2007-03-25T23:48:00 <rhoe> it's just for AccessibleMoin
2007-03-25T23:48:17 <rhoe> there such things could be needed, e.g. for skip links and accesskeys
2007-03-25T23:48:20 <ThomasWaldmann> well, we can't use ids if we have multiple of them
2007-03-25T23:48:36 <rhoe> right, that's the reason why you replaced it..
2007-03-25T23:48:47 <rhoe> but how about the name keyword
2007-03-25T23:48:50 <rhoe> ?
2007-03-25T23:49:00 <rhoe> i used that massively in simplemente..
2007-03-25T23:49:15 <rhoe> had to overwrite the stuff from theme.init
2007-03-25T23:49:27 <rhoe> to provide somekind of anchor target..
2007-03-25T23:50:03 <rhoe> and name can occur more than 1 time in a page..
2007-03-25T23:50:18 <rhoe> so that would be also ok..
2007-03-25T23:50:44 <rhoe> does validate..
2007-03-25T23:50:52 <rhoe> name="nbinfo"
2007-03-25T23:50:58 <ThomasWaldmann> can i access name from css?
2007-03-25T23:51:28 <rhoe> no, i don't think so, i am not sure...
2007-03-25T23:51:42 <rhoe> the be on the safe side we would have to use both class and name..
2007-03-25T23:51:51 <rhoe> instead of just id..
2007-03-25T23:52:28 <rhoe> so there would be css access and javascript and anchors access in a valid html 4.01 strivt way
2007-03-25T23:54:20 <ThomasWaldmann> maybe put that on some accessibility feature request page, i guess if we do that, we have to do that at many places
2007-03-25T23:54:39 <rhoe> ok. i will keep that in mind..
MoinMoin: MoinMoinChat/Logs/moin-dev/2007-03-25 (last edited 2007-10-29 19:20:54 by localhost)