2009-03-27T00:14:15 *** alfonsodg has quit IRC
2009-03-27T00:18:23 *** alfonsodg has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T00:39:12 *** grzywacz has quit IRC
2009-03-27T01:07:43 *** stargamih has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T01:08:09 *** ThomasWaldmann has quit IRC
2009-03-27T01:08:14 *** ThomasWaldmann has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T01:09:28 *** stargaming has quit IRC
2009-03-27T01:42:33 *** alfonsodg has quit IRC
2009-03-27T01:49:42 *** alfonsodg has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T02:07:24 *** ronny has quit IRC
2009-03-27T02:07:27 *** ronny has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T02:34:19 *** alfonsodg has quit IRC
2009-03-27T02:51:37 *** alfonsodg has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T02:52:40 *** alfonsodg has left #moin-dev
2009-03-27T06:25:59 *** stargamih is now known as stargaming
2009-03-27T08:36:24 <dreimark> moin
2009-03-27T08:39:53 <ThomasWaldmann> moin
2009-03-27T08:52:30 <ThomasWaldmann> TheSheep: do you think we could have some js that sets a MOIN_SCREEN cookie with browser window inner width/height?
2009-03-27T08:54:32 * dreimark thought on that too or we can add it to the session file
2009-03-27T08:55:07 <ThomasWaldmann> js has no access to session storage
2009-03-27T08:59:05 <TheSheep> ThomasWaldmann: why?
2009-03-27T08:59:46 <TheSheep> ThomasWaldmann: it can be obsolete at the next request
2009-03-27T09:00:43 <TheSheep> you can measure the size of any element
2009-03-27T09:01:36 <ThomasWaldmann> sure, it'll be always one behind. but users do not resize that often.
2009-03-27T09:02:31 <ThomasWaldmann> e.g. on the attachment view page, we are embedding a pdf viewer. we seem to need to give it dimensions.
2009-03-27T09:02:35 <dreimark> I think we need it only to get the may size of the browser window
2009-03-27T09:02:48 <dreimark> s/may/max/
2009-03-27T09:03:14 <ThomasWaldmann> currently there is 800w hardcoded, which is badly insufficient if your browser window is almost 1600w.
2009-03-27T09:03:33 <dreimark> or it is too large if you fetch it from a mobile
2009-03-27T09:03:50 <ThomasWaldmann> indeed
2009-03-27T09:04:12 <TheSheep> use relative widths...
2009-03-27T09:04:16 <dreimark> that's why I think we only have to care for the max size of the window
2009-03-27T09:04:31 <dreimark> TheSheep: does not work with stupid extensions
2009-03-27T09:04:37 <TheSheep> file a bug
2009-03-27T09:04:46 <dreimark> and meanwhile ?
2009-03-27T09:05:31 <TheSheep> what you suggest is broken, won't work when users switch computers, or go from computer to a mobile, or even resize their browser window
2009-03-27T09:06:38 <TheSheep> of course it can be done, very easily, docuemnt.clientWidth is what you look for
2009-03-27T09:06:48 <TheSheep> document
2009-03-27T09:07:11 <TheSheep> and document.cookie
2009-03-27T09:07:18 <dreimark> alternativly can we have a button nearby an embedded object for showing it on max width? and do remember the setting?
2009-03-27T09:07:21 <ThomasWaldmann> the js of course needs to update the cookie, at least when window dimensions are changing, maybe even just on every request. of course it will be still 1 request behind.
2009-03-27T09:08:19 <TheSheep> document.cookie = 'screenWidth='+document.clientWidth+'; path=/';
2009-03-27T09:08:42 <ThomasWaldmann> dreimark: no more buttons, users are already complaining about the 2 clicks for downloading an attachment
2009-03-27T09:09:28 <TheSheep> you probably want some small expiration timeout too
2009-03-27T09:12:05 <ThomasWaldmann> yeah, in case there is no js after switching browsers
2009-03-27T09:13:50 <TheSheep> document.cookie = 'screenWidth='+document.clientWidth+'; path=/; expires='+ (new Date()+3600000).toGMTString();
2009-03-27T09:14:13 <TheSheep> something like that
2009-03-27T09:14:16 <TheSheep> not tested
2009-03-27T09:14:26 <TheSheep> I have to run
2009-03-27T09:14:37 <ThomasWaldmann> we need to generate the path from moin config settings anyway
2009-03-27T09:14:45 <ThomasWaldmann> thanks :)
2009-03-27T09:16:43 * dreimark creates an adobe account
2009-03-27T09:17:15 <dreimark> funny questions "How many employees are in your organization worldwide?"
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** ser has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** Noya has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** xorAxAx has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** starshine_away has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** ChanServ has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** vpv has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** waldi has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** TheSheep has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** ThomasWaldmann has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** stargaming has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** dreimark has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** CIA-13 has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:04:49 *** ronny has quit IRC
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** ChanServ has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** ronny has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** ThomasWaldmann has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** stargaming has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** dreimark has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** vpv has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** TheSheep has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** waldi has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** Noya has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** xorAxAx has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** starshine_away has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** ser has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** CIA-13 has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T12:05:47 *** irc.freenode.net sets mode: +o ChanServ
2009-03-27T16:13:10 <dreimark> bbl
2009-03-27T17:53:22 *** grzywacz has joined #moin-dev
2009-03-27T19:17:24 <ThomasWaldmann> re
2009-03-27T20:18:08 <ser> how can i ask moin to get IP from X-forwarded-for?
2009-03-27T20:28:36 <ThomasWaldmann> which moin version?
2009-03-27T20:32:33 <ser> it does not matter, i can upgrade
2009-03-27T20:33:13 <ThomasWaldmann> for 1.7/1.8 you need to modify request/__init__.py with your proxy ip(s)
2009-03-27T20:33:25 <ThomasWaldmann> for 1.9 there is a middleware handling this
2009-03-27T20:33:55 <ser> thanks, Thomas for a hint!
2009-03-27T20:34:05 <dreimark> moin
2009-03-27T20:34:28 <dreimark> grzywacz: I have still problems to communicate
2009-03-27T20:34:44 <dreimark> but http://pyxmpp.jajcus.net/svn/pyxmpp/trunk/examples/echobot.py does throw no error
2009-03-27T20:34:59 <dreimark> so I guess my jabberserver performs well
2009-03-27T20:35:31 <dreimark> it shows status messages and so on
2009-03-27T20:39:30 <dreimark> If I try to initialize it step by step I get get http://paste.pocoo.org/show/109889/
2009-03-27T20:40:45 <dreimark> (I am still in the 1.7 repo)
2009-03-27T21:27:07 * ThomasWaldmann plays with js
2009-03-27T21:27:37 * TheSheep too
2009-03-27T21:33:56 <ThomasWaldmann> TheSheep: window w/h?
2009-03-27T21:34:28 <TheSheep> ThomasWaldmann: keeping the cursor position when clicking preview
2009-03-27T21:35:24 <ThomasWaldmann> ah
2009-03-27T21:35:27 <TheSheep> ThomasWaldmann: but I can do the window dimensions too, at lest the js part
2009-03-27T21:35:48 <TheSheep> btw, perhaps you don't want the window size, but the size of the content div?
2009-03-27T21:36:26 <TheSheep> at least for the width
2009-03-27T21:48:22 * dreimark plays with jabber and different settings
2009-03-27T21:48:55 <ThomasWaldmann> cookies
2009-03-27T21:48:55 <ThomasWaldmann> Name MOIN_DIM
2009-03-27T21:48:58 <ThomasWaldmann> Value 633,485
2009-03-27T22:01:32 <grzywacz> dreimark, hm
2009-03-27T22:03:01 <grzywacz> dreimark, I think the error message is quite descriptive
2009-03-27T22:05:48 <dreimark> yeah, sounds it is incompatible with a recent version
2009-03-27T22:22:28 <dreimark> grzywacz: ser on #moin has it working so it is something on my config or installation
2009-03-27T22:27:02 <grzywacz> dreimark, look at enabled auth methods in your jabber server
2009-03-27T22:28:14 <ThomasWaldmann> crap. of course IE needs to do it differently.
2009-03-27T22:28:29 <ThomasWaldmann> and also, innerWidth does not seem to work for content div
2009-03-27T22:33:08 <TheSheep> maybe scrollWidth?
2009-03-27T22:33:15 <TheSheep> or clientWidth?
2009-03-27T22:33:22 <TheSheep> I think yo uwant the latter
2009-03-27T22:35:17 <dreimark> grzywacz: do you know another url than http://jabberd.jabberstudio.org/1.4/ for instructions
2009-03-27T22:35:37 <dreimark> I have not thought that it is broken while I was reading the first lines of the xml file
2009-03-27T22:35:49 <dreimark> "This is the Jabber server configuration file. The file is broken
2009-03-27T22:35:57 <dreimark> " but it was meant different
2009-03-27T22:39:57 <ser> grzywacz: hi, i am also trying to ruun jabberbot
2009-03-27T22:40:28 <ser> it looks it is working, no errors, but it does not deliver anything
2009-03-27T22:41:01 <dreimark> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/109916/ If I don't read it wrong I should have auth_plain also
2009-03-27T22:52:42 <ThomasWaldmann> TheSheep: shouldn't any element work with innerWidth?
2009-03-27T22:53:02 <TheSheep> ThomasWaldmann: yeah
2009-03-27T22:53:16 <TheSheep> ThomasWaldmann: when is the script running?
2009-03-27T22:53:26 <ThomasWaldmann> div id="content" does not
2009-03-27T22:53:39 <ThomasWaldmann> onload
2009-03-27T22:57:23 <TheSheep> that's strange
2009-03-27T22:58:11 <TheSheep> ThomasWaldmann: ah!
2009-03-27T22:58:19 <TheSheep> ThomasWaldmann: that's because there is no innerWidth :)
2009-03-27T22:58:27 <TheSheep> ThomasWaldmann: it;s called clientWidth
2009-03-27T22:58:58 <TheSheep> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/element#Properties
2009-03-27T23:03:53 <dreimark> btw. we have two scrollbars by using the gui editor too
2009-03-27T23:05:54 <TheSheep> but scrolling the gui editor should be much easier
2009-03-27T23:06:26 <TheSheep> you can use the scrollIntoView method
2009-03-27T23:09:37 <ThomasWaldmann> hmm, great, clientWidth doesn't work for window
2009-03-27T23:10:37 <TheSheep> window has InnerWidth :)
2009-03-27T23:10:50 <TheSheep> they are different things
2009-03-27T23:11:10 <ThomasWaldmann> i just want the inner width of some element
2009-03-27T23:11:35 <TheSheep> element.clientWidth
2009-03-27T23:12:00 <TheSheep> no, wait, inner?
2009-03-27T23:12:05 <ThomasWaldmann> element in a generic sense, including window
2009-03-27T23:12:10 <TheSheep> that's element.scrollWidth
2009-03-27T23:12:52 <ThomasWaldmann> somehow each time I touch js or css, I am fed up with it an hour later :P
2009-03-27T23:13:24 <TheSheep> it requires a specific mindset
2009-03-27T23:13:38 <TheSheep> you should really try mochikit or jquery
2009-03-27T23:13:47 <TheSheep> they abstract such details
2009-03-27T23:24:33 <ThomasWaldmann> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/27/1934256&art_pos=4
2009-03-27T23:25:10 <ser> ive times faster? hahahhaa
2009-03-27T23:26:24 <ser> Java spokes person: "5x faster? We already do that."
2009-03-27T23:26:30 <ser> hahahah good comment
2009-03-27T23:31:05 <TheSheep> the pypy guys already showed how you can speed it up
2009-03-27T23:31:19 <TheSheep> so it's just a question of the amount of work
2009-03-27T23:32:02 <TheSheep> if google pumps cash into it, it's pretty possible
2009-03-27T23:39:14 <TheSheep> I've been bitten by the email module having different submodules too today
2009-03-27T23:39:28 <TheSheep> it's completely sick
2009-03-27T23:39:57 <dreimark> similiar to the one on the mailing list?
2009-03-27T23:42:40 <TheSheep> yes
2009-03-27T23:53:43 <ThomasWaldmann> TheSheep: i don't know mochikit and jquery
2009-03-27T23:54:05 <ThomasWaldmann> from a quick glance, jquery seems to be a bit more alive than mochikit
2009-03-27T23:55:56 <TheSheep> yeah
2009-03-27T23:56:03 <TheSheep> and it's rubish
2009-03-27T23:56:08 <TheSheep> (single b)
2009-03-27T23:56:30 <TheSheep> there is also prototype
2009-03-27T23:56:45 <TheSheep> mochikit is supposed to be the most 'pythonic'
2009-03-27T23:58:23 <ThomasWaldmann> rubish?
2009-03-27T23:59:20 <ThomasWaldmann> ruby-ish?
2009-03-27T23:59:27 <TheSheep> _('#conten h1').each(do something);
2009-03-27T23:59:58 <TheSheep> I like how it uses css-like selectors for elements
MoinMoin: MoinMoinChat/Logs/moin-dev/2009-03-27 (last edited 2009-03-26 23:15:02 by IrcLogImporter)